The Amazing Race   American Idol   The Apprentice   The Bachelor   The Bachelorette   Big Brother   The Biggest Loser
Dancing with the Stars   So You Think You Can Dance   Survivor   Top Model   The Voice   The X Factor       Reality TV World
   
Reality TV World Message Board Forums
PLEASE NOTE: The Reality TV World Message Boards are filled with desperate attention-seekers pretending to be one big happy PG/PG13-rated family. Don't be fooled. Trying to get everyone to agree with you is like herding cats, but intolerance for other viewpoints is NOT welcome and respect for other posters IS required at all times. Jump in and play, and you'll soon find out how easy it is to fit in, but save your drama for your mama. All members are encouraged to read the complete guidelines. As entertainment critic Roger Ebert once said, "If you disagree with something I write, tell me so, argue with me, correct me--but don't tell me to shut up. That's not the American way."
"Maybe a Survivor Winners Only season? "
Email this topic to a friend
Printer-friendly version of this topic
Bookmark this topic (Registered users only)
 
Previous Topic | Next Topic 
Conferences Survivor Fanatic Forum (Protected)
Original message

NedraSue 107 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Blistex Spokesperson"

03-05-10, 05:13 PM (EST)
Click to EMail NedraSue Click to send private message to NedraSue Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
"Maybe a Survivor Winners Only season? "
Granted, if Pavarti or Sandra win this season, you would have to wait a couple of seasons to get 20 winners...but if they can wait for Hatch to be released from his home arrest or whatever is going on...and then they would have to deal with Brian, but it would be pretty cool...all millionaires?

Then you take out the entire arguement of 'they've won before' classification. Everyone is a winner. Ethan would need to get a lot stronger! Wait another year or so!

It would be a great season...even if only 16 returned? The status would still be there. Just a thought.


  Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Table of Contents

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
 RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only s... iltarion 03-06-10 1
 RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only s... Colonel Zoidberg 03-23-10 3
   RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only s... michel 03-23-10 4
       RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only s... Spanky68 03-24-10 5
       RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only s... Colonel Zoidberg 03-24-10 6
           RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only s... michel 03-24-10 7

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Messages in this topic

iltarion 1791 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Herbal Healing Drugs Endorser"

03-06-10, 02:22 AM (EST)
Click to EMail iltarion Click to send private message to iltarion Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
1. "RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only season? "

A decent idea. I would watch, but I think this season is showing being a former winner doesn't put THAT big of a target on your back. We've had 4 boots so far, and all 4 winners are still there.

>

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Colonel Zoidberg 3645 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Thong Contest Judge"

03-23-10, 08:08 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Colonel%20Zoidberg Click to send private message to Colonel%20Zoidberg Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
3. "RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only season? "
Hmmm...let's see...who's the most useless-sack-of-poop winner we've had so far?

They're a lock to win Survivor: All-Winners.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

michel 10812 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

03-23-10, 09:29 PM (EST)
Click to EMail michel Click to send private message to michel Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
4. "RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only season? "
The goal of Survivor isn't to be the Most Valuable Player. It never was. The goal is to make it to the end and win the votes. To do that, you must get people on your side. If the MVP-type players made an alliance to the end, they could win. If they don't, they aren't smart enough, survivor-savvy enough, to win. They won't, they (almost) never do.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Spanky68 8092 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

03-24-10, 08:35 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Spanky68 Click to send private message to Spanky68 Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
5. "RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only season? "
Valid points, but the assumption there is that everyone has an equal chance to make those "survivor-savvy moves". I don't think they do.

If I was a middling-talented survivor and was looking to oust a big physical threat and set up an alliance with someone I could possibly beat in the final challenges, I don't even consider allowing a challenge-hog into that scenario. Instead, I plot with a Cerie or Candice type person to oust Ozzie.

I agree that maybe the challenge-hog isn't as intelligent as that survivor-savvy player. But maybe he isn't given the opportunities that the non-threat is given either.


Agman made this fancy sig for me

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Colonel Zoidberg 3645 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Thong Contest Judge"

03-24-10, 04:28 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Colonel%20Zoidberg Click to send private message to Colonel%20Zoidberg Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
6. "RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only season? "
Two points:

1. Amber and Parvati played subpar games their first times out - but did well in All-Stars. As such, I judged the likeliest winners to be people who didn't do so well their first times out.

2. Most winners are deserving. A lot of times, they win weak seasons (Pearl Islands' competition was pretty flat, and Amazon's editing was extremely deceptive, but I am hard-pressed to state that any winner didn't stake at least some legitimate claim to victory. Sure, there are others who may have played the game better that season, but, for example, Natalie wasn't entirely undeserving. Nor was, say, Aras.)

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

michel 10812 desperate attention whore postings
DAW Level: "Playboy Centerfold"

03-24-10, 06:49 PM (EST)
Click to EMail michel Click to send private message to michel Click to view user profile Click to check IP address of the poster
7. "RE: Maybe a Survivor Winners Only season? "

Although Amber benefitted from not being considered a threat, your comparison comes short of considering the following: A$$ v.01 wasn't an all-winner edition, both Amber and Parvati improved their games greatly on their second attempt and Parvati was almost assured of F3 if production hadn't twisted CI upside down so much.

Regarding Ozzy, the first thing he did when NuAitu was formed was to plot against Yul's side and Yul did the same, targeting Cece to weaken Ozzy. That's what I meant by MVP-types not sticking together. LooK at the pathetic Heroes this season. Rupert talked to Tom about an alliance but Tom didn't follow-up on it.

  Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top


Lock | Archive | Remove

Lobby | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e - p l a c e h o l d e r t e x t g o e s h e r e -
about this site   •   advertise on this site  •   contact us  •   privacy policy   •